翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R U the Girl ・ R U There ・ R U Tuff Enuff ・ R Umadevi Nagaraj ・ R Ursae Minoris ・ R v Adams ・ R v Adams (1957) ・ R v Adams (South Africa) ・ R v Albert ・ R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ・ R (complexity) ・ R (cross section ratio) ・ R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ・ R (disambiguation) ・ R (E) v Governing Body of JFS ・ R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport ・ R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport ・ R (film) ・ R (GC) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis ・ R (Green Environmental Industries Ltd) v Hertfordshire CC ・ R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport ・ R (Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee ・ R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis ・ R (Los Angeles Railway) ・ R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee ・ R (New York City Subway service) ・ R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice ・ R (on the application of SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ・ R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body ・ R (programming language) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport ： ウィキペディア英語版 R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport ''R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport'' () (UKHL 55 ) is a UK asylum case concerning Article 33 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. ==Facts== Romas were 400 times more likely than others to be refused entry to the UK under a policy of British immigration officials to "pre-clear" passengers boarding flights within Immigration Rules. If officers concluded that the passengers would claim asylum once they arrived, they would be refused entry. The ERRC brought this action, alleging direct discrimination, on behalf of a group of asylum-seekers. Roma suffer discrimination at home, in particular many attacks by skinheads. The claimants, represented by Lester QC, said that the Government, represented by Greenwood QC, was breaching its international obligations. The Court of Appeal〔() EWCA Civ 666, () QB 811〕 distanced itself from the "but for" test by a majority, holding that there was no discrimination. Laws LJ, dissenting, said that it was an "inescapable" conclusion that this was stereotyping of Roma. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R (European Roma Rights Centre) v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.